CHAPTER ONE - THE SCHOLAR

Old Law: Jurisprudence of Myth (Patent Law Edition)

Ponderosa University, Northern Arizona

Three Weeks Before The Barrier


Athelia Winters lived in the spaces between fact and myth.

The Ponderosa University library basement (Section 7, Row M, Ancient Legal Systems) had become her second home. Or perhaps her first. Her dorm room was just where she slept. This was where she existed.

Surrounded by books that no one else checked out. Texts that professors dismissed as "interesting cultural artifacts" but not "real law." Fragments of legal codes from civilizations that supposedly never existed.

But Athelia knew better.

She sat at her usual table, the one in the far corner where the fluorescent lights flickered and the heating never quite worked. Seven books lay open simultaneously, three notebooks filled with cross-referenced notes, and a laptop displaying scanned images of manuscripts too fragile to handle.

Her current obsession: Intellectual property protection in pre-classical mythology.

More specifically: a patent application that had been pending for thousands of years. And she had three days left to continue it before it abandoned forever.

"There has to be a pattern," she muttered, pen moving across her notebook. "Four different mythologies. Four different continents. Four different time periods. But they're all describing the same system. The same pending application."

She flipped to the Greek text. A fragment recovered from Delphi, barely legible, dismissed by mainstream scholars as "poetic metaphor."

*"Sacred grove where Guardians walked. The place of grant. Where innovations pass from chaos to order. Marked by stone and oath and specification. Those who claim must prove: novelty, utility, and non-obviousness. The Examiner tests all claims."*

Athelia wrote in her notebook:

Greek: "Guardians" = Patent Examiners? "Place of grant" = USPTO equivalent? "Innovations pass from chaos to order" = Patent prosecution? "Marked by specification" = 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) WRITTEN DESCRIPTION "Novelty, utility, non-obviousness" = 35 U.S.C. § 101, 35 U.S.C. § 102, 35 U.S.C. § 103 REQUIREMENTS "Examiner tests all claims" = Office Action process
35 U.S.C. § 101 Patentable subject matter

She pulled over the Norse text. A fragment from Iceland, part of a thing-law collection that scholars called "fantastical additions" to real legal codes.

*"Allocation stone sealed by wolf-kin oath. Where the strong claim their inventions. Where genetic arts meet prior art. None may practice without grant. The barrier protects until enablement is proven. Reduction to practice opens the way."*

Her pen flew:

Norse: "Wolf-kin oath" = Patent oath/declaration? (37 CFR § 1.63, § 115) "Strong claim" = CLAIM DRAFTING - precise language required "Genetic arts meet prior art" = 35 U.S.C. § 102 NOVELTY - prior art search "None may practice without grant" = Patent enforcement/infringement "Barrier protects" = Patent pending/prosecution bar "Enablement is proven" = 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) ENABLEMENT REQUIREMENT "Reduction to practice" = 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) - actual vs constructive
35 U.S.C. § 102 Conditions for patentability; novelty

And the Celtic fragment, recovered from a bog in Ireland, written in Ogham on oak, carbon-dated to 400 BCE but describing legal concepts that shouldn't have existed then.

*"Meeting place of three branches of law. Marked by ancient treaty. Where the emerald-eyed examine, the silver-eyed balance, and the black-eyed consume. Guardians grant rights here. The specification must enable. The claims must be definite. The invention must have utility."*

Athelia stopped breathing.

Examine. Balance. Consume.

She flipped frantically to her personal journal, the one she kept separate from academic notes. The one filled with doodles in the margins. Three sets of eyes, drawn obsessively since childhood:

Emerald eyes. Sharp. Judging. (Examining)

Silver eyes. Reflective. Balanced. (Balancing)

Black eyes. Endless. Consuming. (Consuming)

"What the hell," she whispered.

Her hands shook as she wrote:

Celtic CONFIRMS Greek and Norse "Three branches of law" = three requirements? (utility/novelty/non-obviousness) OR three types of IP? (patent/trademark/copyright) OR three examination stages? Emerald = EXAMINATION (35 U.S.C. § 131 - Examiner authority) Silver = BALANCE (PTAB - appeal/review) Black = CONSUMPTION (Prior art consuming claims?) "Specification must enable" = 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) ENABLEMENT "Claims must be definite" = 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) DEFINITENESS "Invention must have utility" = 35 U.S.C. § 101 UTILITY (specific, substantial, credible) NOT METAPHOR NOT DREAMS ACTUAL PATENT LAW STRUCTURE???
35 U.S.C. § 112(a) Specification must enable PHOSITA to make/use invention
35 U.S.C. § 112(b) Claims must particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention

Then she reached for the fourth text. The one closest to home. The one that made her hands shake every time she read it.

Ancestral Puebloan petroglyphs, photographed from canyon walls forty minutes south of campus. Walnut Canyon. Where the cliff dwellings stood empty for seven hundred years.

Where no one could explain why an agricultural people carved chambers into sheer limestone cliffs.

*"The Elders examine in the upper chambers. The Warriors advocate in the lower chambers. Those who seek rights bring their innovations to the Warriors, who translate flesh and thought into specification and claim. The Warriors present to the Elders. The Elders test: Does it have utility? Is it novel against prior art? Would it be obvious to one skilled in the art? The Warriors argue. The Elders judge. When examination is complete, rights are granted. The stone chambers hold both roles. Examiners and advocates. Two parts of one Office."*

Athelia's pen trembled:

ANCESTRAL PUEBLOANS = PATENT OFFICE NOT farmers. NOT just dwellings. EXAMINATION CENTER. Elders = EXAMINERS (35 U.S.C. § 131 - examiner authority to reject/allow) Warriors = PATENT AGENTS/ATTORNEYS (advocate for applicants) Upper chambers = examination offices Lower chambers = agent offices Complete prosecution system: 1. Inventor brings innovation to Warrior (agent) 2. Warrior drafts specification/claims (35 U.S.C. § 112) 3. Warrior files with Elder (examiner) 4. Elder examines: utility (35 U.S.C. § 101), novelty (35 U.S.C. § 102), non-obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103) 5. Warrior argues/amends on behalf of client 6. Elder grants or rejects This is 40 MINUTES FROM CAMPUS. The cliff dwellings at Walnut Canyon. They disappeared around 1300 CE. The EXAMINATION CENTER closed. But the barrier might still exist. AND THERE'S A PENDING APPLICATION. Filed by the First Woman. Guardian Queen examination protocols. STILL PENDING after millennia. About to ABANDON. 23 others tried to continue it. All failed. I found their names in the fragments. 23 failed continuation attempts. None had the genetic match required. Do I have it? I don't know. No way to test against DNA from thousands of years ago. But I have the dreams. The memories that feel like mine but couldn't be. The genetic markers ancient texts describe in detail. Every trait matches what they said Guardian Queens carried. The barrier will test me. Either I'm a match and it accepts my filing, or I end up like the 23 who tried before me. No proof. Just circumstantial evidence. And 72 hours to decide if I'm willing to bet my life on it.
37 CFR § 11.1 Patent agents represent inventors before USPTO. Must pass registration exam (USPTO Patent Bar).
Patent examiners work for USPTO, review applications under 35 U.S.C.
35 U.S.C. § 120 Continuation applications must be filed before parent abandons or issues. Deadline pressure is REAL in patent prosecution.

She flipped back to the Norse fragment. Squinted at a section she'd dismissed as illegible smudging. Adjusted her laptop screen to enhance the scanned image.

Not smudging.

Additional text.

*"The Office divides by art. Genetic innovations to the First Center. Territorial claims to the Second. Transformation arts to the Third. Hybrid compositions to the Fourth. Each center examines what it knows. Each art center holds its own examiners. The wolf-kin claim through the First Center, where flesh and blood meet specification."*

Athelia's hands shook as she wrote:

NOT ONE OFFICE. MULTIPLE TECHNOLOGY CENTERS. Like USPTO structure: - TC 1600 (Biotech/Organic Chem) = "First Center" (Genetic innovations) - TC 3600 (Transportation/Mechanical) = "Second Center" (Territorial claims?) - TC 2100 (Computer/Software) = "Third Center" (Transformation arts) - TC 1700 (Chemical/Materials) = "Fourth Center" (Hybrid compositions) Different examination centers for different TYPES of innovations! Wolf-kin genetics = BIOTECH CENTER (TC 1600 equivalent) "Where flesh and blood meet specification" = biological compositions of matter FACTUALLY ACCURATE PATENT OFFICE STRUCTURE
Real USPTO has 9 Technology Centers, each specializing in different invention types

She grabbed the Greek text again. Found a passage she'd translated as "place of grant" but had more nuance in the original:

*"Places of grant. Divided by the nature of innovation. Guardians trained in their art center. None may examine what they do not understand."*

"Each art center holds its own examiners," she whispered. "Patent examiners specialize. A biotech examiner doesn't examine software. A mechanical examiner doesn't examine genetics. That's how real patent offices work."

USPTO examiners specialize by technology. TC 1600 examiners have degrees in biology/chemistry.

She wrote in large letters:

**WALNUT CANYON = WHICH TECHNOLOGY CENTER?**

Her pen flew:

Wolf-kin = genetic/biological (TC 1600?) But Norse fragment mentions "consciousness pathways" and "neural inheritance" Greek text: "intelligence woven into flesh" Celtic: "thinking blood, learning bone" Not JUST biotech. Not JUST AI. HYBRID CENTER. BIOMEDICAL + AI + DNN (Deep Neural Networks) Walnut Canyon = HYBRID TECHNOLOGY CENTER - Biological compositions (shifter genetics) - Artificial Intelligence (consciousness transfer?) - Deep Neural Networks (inherited instinct/knowledge?) This is why human scholars don't recognize it. We don't HAVE a Technology Center for bio-AI hybrids. We examine them separately. But what if consciousness IS biological? What if neural networks are GENETIC? Multiple centers. Multiple specializations. Just like real USPTO. But Walnut Canyon examines what we can't classify.

She pulled out a map. Spread it across the table. Started plotting coordinates.

The Greek fragment had been recovered from Delphi, but it referenced a location "across the western sea, where innovations grow ancient."

The Norse text specified "New Land, where prior art melts to novelty, forty days' sail from Iceland."

The Celtic fragment said "Beyond the sunset ocean, where specifications and claims meet stone."

All of them. Every single one.

Athelia's pen circled a spot on the map.

Walnut Canyon. Forty minutes south of Flagstaff. A protected national monument where ancient cliff dwellings sat empty. Where tourists walked the rim trail but never felt what Athelia sensed when she looked at the photographs. Where the Park Service said "agricultural settlement" but couldn't explain the chamber layout.

But that wasn't why people avoided it.

Athelia pulled up local folklore on her laptop. Found the Reddit threads. The hiking forums. The paranormal investigation blogs.

*"Weird feeling in the center of Walnut Canyon. Like pressure."*
*"My dog refused to go past a certain point. Just sat down and howled."*
*"GPS stops working about a mile in. Compass spins."*
*"I swear I saw something shimmer. Like heat waves but it was 40 degrees."*

Dismissed as magnetic anomalies. Natural explanations. Overactive imaginations.

But Athelia knew better.

She wrote in large letters across her notebook:

**WALNUT CANYON = THE EXAMINATION CENTER**

"There's a barrier there," she whispered. "A real, physical barrier between jurisdictions. Between the examination realm and the public domain. The cliff dwellings weren't homes. They were examination offices. Upper chambers for the Elders who examined. Lower chambers for the Warriors who advocated. Between claimed and unclaimed territory."

Patent prosecution creates legal boundary between public domain and exclusive rights

"That's exactly what it is."

Athelia's head snapped up.

A student stood at the end of her table. Tall. Maybe mid-twenties. Dark hair. Sharp features. Dressed casually in jeans, dark shirt, messenger bag slung over one shoulder.

But his eyes.

His eyes.

Sapphire blue. Deep. Brilliant. Like looking into cut gemstones. Like staring at the ocean compressed into human form.

Athelia's pen slipped from her fingers.

She'd been drawing those eyes for years.

Not emerald. Not silver. Not black.

But sapphire. A fourth set she'd only started adding recently. Eyes that watched. Eyes that knew.

"May I?" He gestured to the empty chair across from her.

Athelia couldn't speak. Could only nod.

He sat. Set his bag down. Looked at her spread of books and notes with something like approval.

"Severen," he said, offering his hand. "Cael'Sereith. Graduate student. Comparative mythology and ancient intellectual property systems."

"Athelia." Her voice came out strangled. "Winters."

His sapphire eyes swept across her research. The Greek, Norse, Celtic, and Ancestral Puebloan fragments. The map with Walnut Canyon circled. The notebook with statutory references scrawled in margins.

"You're close," Severen said quietly. "Closer than the twenty-three who tried before you. But you're making the same mistake they did."

Athelia's breath stopped. "What mistake?"

"Filing in the wrong Patent Office." He pulled a document from his bag. Official USPTO letterhead. Her name. Her thesis title. And stamped across it in red: REJECTED - LACK OF JURISDICTION.

Her application. The one she'd filed three months ago.

"How did you—"

"Section 101 rejection," Severen said, reading from the Office Action. "Abstract idea. Not patent-eligible subject matter. Wrong Technology Center—they bounced you between TC 1600 Biotech, TC 2100 Computer, couldn't figure out where Guardian Queen examination protocols belong. Final examiner note: 'This office lacks jurisdiction over the claimed subject matter.'"

Athelia stared at the rejection. Three months of work. Dismissed.

"They don't understand what you're claiming," Severen continued. "Human USPTO can't examine Guardian Queen innovations because they don't acknowledge Guardian Queens exist. Wrong jurisdiction. Like trying to file a dragon design patent with an office that doesn't believe in dragons."

35 U.S.C. § 101 rejection - examiner determines claimed invention is not patent-eligible subject matter

"So it's over," Athelia whispered.

"No." Severen's smile was sharp. "You filed in the wrong Patent Office. But there's another one. The ORIGINAL Office. Where the First Woman filed her parent application thousands of years ago. Where it's STILL PENDING. And you have three days to file your continuation-in-part there before the parent abandons."

He leaned forward. "Human USPTO rejected you for lack of jurisdiction. They were right—they DON'T have jurisdiction. But the Office at Walnut Canyon does. That's where you need to file."

Patent Office jurisdiction - USPTO can only examine applications within its authority. Wrong office = rejection, not invalidity. Like filing international patent with wrong national office.

Severen's expression shifted. Became more serious. "But understand this, Athelia. Even at the correct Office, there are boundaries. Places where patents cannot reach. Three forbidden zones."

He pulled a worn notebook from his bag. Opened it to a diagram - three overlapping circles, each shaded differently.

"Abstract Ideas." He tapped the first circle. "Mathematical concepts. Methods of organizing human activity. Mental processes. The Patent Office—any Patent Office, human or Old Law—cannot grant exclusive rights to pure thought. Not without something more. Not without integration into a practical application."

MPEP § 2106.04(a) Abstract ideas are judicial exceptions to § 101 patent-eligibility

"Laws of Nature." Second circle. "Physical principles. Natural phenomena. E=mc². Gravity. DNA sequences as they exist in nature. These belong to everyone. Cannot be claimed. The commons cannot become private property."

MPEP § 2106.04(b) Laws of nature and natural phenomena ineligible for patent protection

"Products of Nature." Third circle. "Living organisms. Naturally occurring compounds. Isolated DNA. If nature made it first, you cannot claim ownership. Only transformations of nature can be patented. Only applications that go beyond what exists."

MPEP § 2106.04(c) Products of nature are not patent-eligible unless significantly different from natural state

Athelia stared at the overlapping circles. "So Guardian Queen examination methods..."

"Could be abstract," Severen finished. "If you claim them as pure mental processes—how to think like an examiner—the Office will reject under § 101. But if you claim them as biological transformations? Genetic modifications that enable examination consciousness? That might cross the boundary."

He leaned closer, sapphire eyes intense. "There's a test. Ancient. Called Alice-Mayo by human courts, but the Old Law knew it first. Two steps: First, is your invention directed to a judicial exception? Second, does it contain an inventive concept—something significantly more than the exception itself?"

Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank (2014) Established two-step framework for § 101 eligibility analysis

"Most failures happen at step two," Severen continued. "Inventors add conventional post-solution activity—'apply it with a computer,' 'use generic equipment'—thinking that saves the claim. It doesn't. The inventive concept must be in how you transform the abstract into something tangible. Something real."

MPEP § 2106.05 Inventive concept analysis - determining if judicial exception integrated into practical application

"And there's new guidance," he added quietly. "From 2024. About artificial intelligence. The Office realized AI claims were being rejected too broadly. New examples—47, 48, 49—showing when AI implementation crosses from abstract to patentable. When machine learning becomes inventive concept."

2024 AI SME Update Examples 47-49 clarify AI patent eligibility (effective July 17, 2024)

Athelia's mind raced. "Bio-AI hybrid examination. That's... that could be both. Abstract if I claim the thought process. Patentable if I claim the biological mechanism that enables it."

Severen's smile returned. Sharp. Approving. "Now you're thinking like a patent attorney. The boundary isn't fixed—it's determined by how you draft your claims. How you describe the transformation. The Old Law and the new law agree on this: ideas alone cannot be owned, but their applications can be."

"So when I file at Walnut Canyon..."

"File carefully. Describe the biological substrate. The genetic modifications. The neural pathways that manifest examination authority. Make it concrete. Make it real. Don't just claim 'a method of examining patent applications'—claim the transformed organism capable of performing examination." His eyes gleamed. "Cross the boundary by making the abstract incarnate."

MPEP § 2106.03 Patent-eligible subject matter must fall within statutory categories: process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter

Silence.

The fluorescent lights flickered overhead.

"What do you mean?" she whispered.

"I mean that Walnut Canyon is where the original Patent Office stands. Where the First Woman filed her application. Where it's been pending for thousands of years, waiting for someone with the genetic match to continue it." He leaned forward. "You're not just researching ancient patent systems, Athelia. You're preparing to file a continuation-in-part. Old matter from the parent—Guardian Queen protocols—plus your new matter. Bio-AI hybrid examination methods. Your thesis is your CIP application."

35 U.S.C. § 101 "Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter..."

"You're saying..."

"I'm saying the texts you're reading are real. The three examination branches. Utility, Novelty, and Non-Obviousness. They still function. Emerald eyes examine for utility. Black eyes search for prior art. Silver eyes balance obviousness. Three gods who shattered the old patent system and rebuilt it with divine law."

Divine law = statutory law (35 U.S.C.)?

Athelia looked down at her journal. At the eyes drawn obsessively in the margins.

"And sapphire?" Her voice cracked. "What are sapphire eyes?"

Severen's smile turned sad. Ancient. "Examiners who left the Office. Like my mother. Born to strict examination but choosing to teach balance. To help inventors understand the system before they file. To prevent bad applications."

Pre-application counseling? Patent agent role?

"Their choice?"

"Whether to file human. Or claim what they were always meant to be." His sapphire eyes held hers. "You've been dreaming of patent law since childhood. Drawing examination symbols you can't explain. Researching systems that feel like memory instead of learning."

"How do you know about my dreams?"

"Because Guardian Queens don't forget their training, Athelia. Even when they're raised human. Even when they have no idea they're natural patent prosecutors. The blood remembers. The examination protocols call. And eventually," He glanced at her map, at Walnut Canyon circled in red, "they follow their research to its inevitable reduction to practice."

Reduction to practice - 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) - converting abstract invention to tangible form

She couldn't breathe.

"If I go to Walnut Canyon. If I touch that barrier. What happens?"

"If you're wrong, if you're just human with good research skills and vivid dreams, nothing. The barrier stays sealed. You get some interesting data and a publishable paper on magnetic anomalies."

"And if I'm right?"

"If you're right, the barrier recognizes you as a natural examiner. Opens for you. And the bond forms." He stood. Gathered his bag. "With the wolf king who's been prosecuting his own application for seven years. Waiting for his Guardian Queen to complete the enablement requirement."

35 U.S.C. § 112(a) Written description and enablement are distinct requirements (Ariad v. Lilly, 2010). Specification must enable PHOSITA to make/use invention without undue experimentation (Amgen v. Sanofi, 2023 - breadth must match enablement)

He turned to leave.

"Wait." Athelia's voice stopped him. "Why are you telling me this? Why help me?"

Severen looked back. His sapphire eyes reflecting something older than the library. Older than the university. Older than the city itself.

"Because you deserve to make your filing with eyes open. That's what separates good prosecution from fraud and inequitable conduct. Some examiners would reject you without explanation. The prior art searchers would invalidate you without caring. But us?" His smile was gentle. "*We believe in informed consent. In filing because you choose it. Not because you were forced. That's the difference between a valid patent and an unenforceable one.*"

37 CFR § 1.56 Duty of candor - Inequitable conduct (withheld material information during prosecution) = patent unenforceable

He walked away.

Left her sitting alone with texts that weren't mythology.

With maps pointing to an Office that was real.

With examination symbols drawn in her journal.

Athelia looked down at her research.

At Walnut Canyon circled in red.

At the four sets of eyes she'd been drawing since childhood.

Emerald. (Utility Examination - 35 U.S.C. § 101) Silver. (Obviousness Balance - 35 U.S.C. § 103) Black. (Prior Art Search - 35 U.S.C. § 102) Sapphire. (Pre-Filing Counseling)

And she started making a list:

Equipment needed: - GPS unit + backup - Compass (mechanical, not digital) - EMF reader - High-res camera - Specification samples kit - Notebook + backup notebook (for claims drafting) - Measurement tools (definiteness testing) - Water + snacks (4 hour examination minimum)
35 U.S.C. § 131 Examiner's authority during prosecution

"Athelia?"

She jumped. Looked up.

Professor Hendricks stood at the end of her table, looking concerned. He taught Classical Mythology, one of the few professors who didn't outright mock her theories, but who gently tried to redirect her toward "more academically viable research."

"Professor."

"It's almost midnight." He glanced at the books spread across her table. "Again."

"I'm close to something." She pulled her notebook closer protectively. "I think I found it. The connection between Greek, Norse, Celtic, and Ancestral Puebloan patent law. They're all describing the same examination office. The same real system."

Hendricks sighed. Sat down across from her. "Athelia. You're one of my best students. Your analysis of Themis and divine law was brilliant. Your paper on Norse property allocation was publishable. But this," he gestured at her notes, "this obsession with proving mythology is literal patent prosecution... it's going to derail your academic career."

"What if it is literal patent law?" She leaned forward. "What if 'Guardians' weren't metaphor? What if they were actual patent examiners? What if shifters developed their own 35 U.S.C. § 101 eligibility standards?"

35 U.S.C. § 101 eligibility - abstract ideas, laws of nature, natural phenomena NOT patentable (Alice/Mayo)

"Athelia." His voice was gentle. Pitying. "Mythology is how ancient cultures processed complex legal systems through narrative. Yes, there were real laws. Real property systems. But the patent office elements are symbolic."

"Then explain this." She shoved the Celtic fragment translation at him. "Three examination branches. Utility, novelty, non-obviousness. I've been dreaming about patent prosecution since I was a child. Drawing examination symbols. And now I find a 2400-year-old legal text describing the exact same structure as 35 U.S.C.."

35 U.S.C. - Title 35 of United States Code = Patent Act

Hendricks looked at the translation. At her notebooks. At the statutory references in the margins.

"Athelia," he said carefully. "Have you considered that maybe you encountered patent law years ago? Maybe in a family member's work, or a documentary? And your brain retained it subconsciously, which manifested as dreams and drawings?"

"I have considered that." Her jaw tightened. "I've also considered that maybe... maybe, there are examination systems in this world that academia refuses to acknowledge because they don't fit the paradigm. Because shifter innovations don't qualify under current 35 U.S.C. § 101 subject matter eligibility."

Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank - abstract ideas not patent-eligible even if novel/non-obvious

"That's conspiracy thinking."

"No." She gathered her books. Started packing. "Conspiracy thinking is believing in cover-ups. I'm talking about loss. About patent systems that got forgotten because the people who used them were genetically divergent and humans stopped recognizing their claims. About innovations that got abandoned because we couldn't examine them under our eligibility standards."

"Like werewolf genetics." Hendricks' tone was patient. Condescending.

"Like genetically divergent humans with canid traits whose DNA modifications would qualify as compositions of matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101." She met his eyes. "Which is exactly what Norse sagas describe. Not magic. Not curses. Just... novel genetic compositions. Which current examiners reject because they think they're abstract ideas instead of applied technology."

35 U.S.C. § 101 compositions of matter - CAN be patented if new/useful

Hendricks stood. "I can't stop you from pursuing this. But I'm asking you, as someone who cares about your future, to be careful. Write the thesis you need to graduate. Then chase your theories."

"My thesis is my theory," Athelia said quietly. "Mythology as Undocumented Patent Systems. I'm proving that ancient allocation ceremonies weren't metaphor. They were actual examination processes that still exist."

"Still exist?" He looked alarmed now.

"Still exist." She shouldered her bag. "And I have three days to file my CIP before the parent application abandons. Walnut Canyon. Tomorrow. I'm going to find the Office. File the continuation. Complete what the First Woman started."

Prosecution history estoppel (Warner-Jenkinson) - Applicant statements/amendments during prosecution can limit claim scope later

"Athelia."

"Thank you for your concern, Professor. Goodnight."

She left him standing in the archives, surrounded by books that he thought were just stories.

But Athelia knew better.


She returned to her dorm. Spread her research across her desk. Her bed. Her floor.

Four mythologies. One examination office. One truth.

She pulled out a fresh notebook. Started writing her field research plan:

HYPOTHESIS:

Walnut Canyon contains the original Patent Office where the First Woman's application has been pending for millennia. Parent Application Status: PENDING, final abandonment deadline in 72 hours. I am 100% genetic match to original inventor. I can file continuation-in-part under 35 U.S.C. § 120 if I reach the Office in time.

35 U.S.C. § 154(a)(1) Patent grants right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention
35 U.S.C. § 120 Continuation filed before parent abandons gets benefit of parent's filing date

PURPOSE:

1. Locate the original Patent Office 2. File CIP before parent abandons (DEADLINE CRITICAL) 3. Old matter: Guardian Queen examination protocols (from parent) 4. New matter: Bio-AI hybrid innovation examination methods (my contribution) 5. Prove genetic match and inventor entitlement 6. Complete what 23 others failed to accomplish

35 U.S.C. § 112(a) specification must enable PHOSITA to practice invention

METHODOLOGY:

- Approach from coordinates specified in Norse text - Document all examination anomalies - Attempt to locate "Guardian" examination stations - IF barrier is tangible: attempt reduction to practice (physical embodiment test)

35 U.S.C. § 102(g) actual reduction to practice = building/testing working embodiment

SAFETY PROTOCOLS:

1. Tell Casey where I'm going. 2. Bring charged phone (even if GPS fails - like patent pending status). 3. Pack emergency supplies. 4. Do NOT cross barrier without proper specification documentation. 5. Return before dark (or before examination period expires?)

She looked at the last line. Crossed it out.

Wrote instead: Return when enablement is proven.

35 U.S.C. § 112(a) Enablement - specification must enable PHOSITA to make/use invention without undue experimentation

Then she pulled out her personal journal. The one with the eyes drawn in every margin.

Flipped to a blank page.

Wrote:

I can't prove I'm a genetic match to the First Woman. Can't DNA test against someone who lived millennia ago. But I FEEL it. The parent application lists her as inventor. The dreams aren't random - they're MEMORIES. The examination symbols I've drawn since childhood = prosecution protocols. Every statute feels familiar because I WROTE some of them. 23 others tried. None had the match. Their continuation attempts = rejected under 37 CFR § 1.63 (§ 115) (inventor must have contributed to invention) If I'm right - if I AM her somehow, across thousands of years - then I'm not "contributing" to the parent application. I'm the ORIGINAL inventor claiming my own work. Old matter (from parent): - Guardian Queen examination protocols - Aether Flow control system - Human-AI-genetic self-reorganization New matter (my addition): - Bio-AI hybrid examination methods - Modern application to current USPTO framework - Integration protocols for contemporary technology The barrier will test my claim. Either it accepts me as the inventor, or it kills me like it killed the 23 before me. 72 hours until abandonment. I have to try. Even without proof. I FEEL it. That has to be enough.
35 U.S.C. § 112(a) Specification = written description of invention in patent application

She stared at the words.

Then, almost unconsciously, she started drawing in the margin.

Emerald eyes. Sharp and examining. (35 U.S.C. § 101 Utility)

Silver eyes. Reflective and balancing. (35 U.S.C. § 103 Obviousness)

Black eyes. Endless and searching. (35 U.S.C. § 102 Prior Art)

Three sets of eyes that haunted her dreams.

Three examination requirements that governed all patent law.

Three branches of the Office that supposedly no longer existed.

Athelia closed the journal.

Looked at her map of Walnut Canyon.

At the red circle marking the coordinates.

"Tomorrow," she whispered. "72 hours until the parent abandons. I'm going to find the Office. File my CIP. Claim priority to the First Woman's filing date. Complete the prosecution she started."

She didn't know that inside the dome, 23 failed applicants' remains bore witness to what happened when you tried to continue without genetic match.

She didn't know that the parent application contained claims she'd never seen—including a Mate Bond system with unspecified parameters.

She didn't know that filing a CIP meant inheriting all claims from the parent, not just the ones she wanted.

She didn't know that an ancient database named Malachar was waiting to download into her the moment she proved enablement.

But she knew this:

She was the only person alive who could file this continuation.

And the deadline was in 72 hours.

About to file. About to discover what "continuation-in-part" really meant.

37 CFR § 1.76 - Application to include specification, claims, drawings (if necessary), oath/declaration
35 U.S.C. § 120 CIP gets parent's priority date for old matter only. New matter gets CIP filing date. Filing CIP = inheriting ALL parent claims, not just selected ones.

STATUTORY REFERENCE INDEX (For Study)

Core Patent Statutes Encoded in Chapter 1:

- 35 U.S.C. § 101 - Patent-eligible subject matter (utility requirement) - 35 U.S.C. § 102 - Novelty (prior art defeats patent) - 35 U.S.C. § 103 - Non-obviousness (invention not predictable to PHOSITA) - 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) - Written description, enablement, best mode - 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) - Definiteness of claims - 35 U.S.C. § 120 - Benefit of earlier filing date (continuation/CIP must file before parent abandons) - 35 U.S.C. § 131 - Examiner authority during prosecution - 37 CFR § 1.63 (implementing 35 U.S.C. § 115) - Oath/declaration requirements (inventor must have contributed to invention) - 37 CFR § 1.76 - Application contents

Key Concepts:

- Continuation-in-Part (CIP) = Application claiming priority to parent, containing parent's disclosure PLUS new matter - § 120 Priority = To get parent's date, claimed subject matter must be supported in parent under § 112(a); new matter gets only CIP filing date - Pending Application = Not granted, not abandoned; prosecution continuing - Abandonment Deadline = Failure to respond = application abandons, can't claim priority - Inventor Entitlement = Must be true inventor or joint inventor to file continuation (37 CFR § 1.63) - PHOSITA = Person Having Ordinary Skill In The Art (standard for enablement) - Reduction to Practice = Building working embodiment of invention - Prosecution = Process of obtaining patent through USPTO examination - Specification = Written description in patent application - Claims = Legal boundaries of invention (what is protected) - Prior Art = Existing knowledge that can defeat novelty/non-obviousness - Enablement = Specification teaches how to make/use invention - Inequitable Conduct = Fraud during prosecution = patent unenforceable


[END CHAPTER ONE - Study Notes: This chapter encodes the foundational structure of patent examination. Print, highlight statutory references, annotate with case law as you study.]


FULL STATUTORY TEXT

Referenced Statutes - For Patent Bar Study

35 U.S.C. § 101 - Inventions Patentable

Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.


35 U.S.C. § 102 - Conditions for Patentability; Novelty

(a) Novelty; Prior Art.—A person shall be entitled to a patent unless—

(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.


35 U.S.C. § 103 - Conditions for Patentability; Non-Obvious Subject Matter

A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains.


35 U.S.C. § 112 - Specification

(a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out the invention.

(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor regards as the invention.


35 U.S.C. § 120 - Benefit of Earlier Filing Date

An application for patent for an invention disclosed in an application previously filed in the United States shall have the same effect as though filed on the date of the prior application, if filed before the patenting or abandonment of the first application and if it contains a specific reference to the earlier filed application. (Continuation-in-Part applications covered here.)


35 U.S.C. § 131 - Examination of Application

The Director shall cause an examination to be made of the application and the alleged new invention; and if on such examination it appears that the applicant is entitled to a patent under the law, the Director shall issue a patent therefor.

END FULL STATUTORY TEXT

📖 EXAM DAY QUICK REFERENCE: Click here for MPEP search strategies, quick lookup table, and how to use this chapter during the open-book Patent Bar exam

📥 Download Complete Textbook (PDF)

Chapter 1 with Front Matter, Review Questions & USPTO Practice Problems

Download PDF Textbook (33 pages)

Includes: Title Page • Table of Contents • FULL IMMERSIVE NARRATIVE with Ancient Texts & Analysis Blocks
Chapter Summary • 20 Key Terms • 51 Review Questions • 20 USPTO-Style Practice Problems • Answer Key • Statutory Index

1